Philip TurpinInternet & Technology addict.

There’s a new Facebook group doing the rounds.  It’s called ‘Roll vs Cole’ and the aim is to see if the Sausage Roll group can get more followers than Cheryl Cole.

What interesting, though, about this particular group is that it’s made it onto the betting site, paddypower.com.

The deal is this:  The Sausage Roll group has to have more followers than Cheryl Cole by 8pm, Sunday 28th Feb.

Current odds are 1/4 yes and 5/2 no.  I think, based on the fact that the group has amassed an amazing 685,000 fans (at the time of writing) since it’s creation on 30th Jan 2010, it’s a fair bet (pun intended) that the Roll will beat Cole.

The facebook group can be found here: http://bit.ly/9jMhoI

Just in case you want to have a flutter, the Paddy Power page can be found here: http://bit.ly/9grRhM

Paddy Power odds on the Sausage Roll beating Cheryl Cole in followers.

I logged in to Facebook, the other day, and saw the User Interface (UI) change right before my eyes.  It seems that Facebook are rolling out a new and improved UI in stages (my other Facebook account is, as yet, untouched.

To start with, the navigation bar, across the top, has been re-designed.

Facebook's new look for the navigation bar on their homepage.

As you can see it’s been changed relatively comprehensively.   For me the two most noticeable (and annoying features) are:  The search bar has been moved to just left of the centre and you can no longer hover over the links on the top to get extra options.

Facebook's updated UI for messages overview.

As an example, in the old Facebook UI, you would hover over the ‘Inbox’ link to display a rop down box with 2, further options, of ‘View Inbox’ and ‘Compose Message’.  Under the new UI hovering has no effect.  You have to click to display the drop down box where the further options as shown.

Clicking on the Messages link gives a nice overview of the most recent messages on your inbox, from place you can choose to click on a message, compose a message or ’see all’ messages which takes you to the Inbox page.

There are two new links that side beside the Messages links which are Notifications and Requests.

The Notifications link acts in exactly the same manner as the Messages link and requires a click in order to display the drop down box as show below:

Facebooks updated UI for Notifications overiew.

Again, you can click on an individual status to be taken to a page to view it in it’s entirety or you can click the ’see all’ link to be taken to the main notifications page.

The last of the 3 links is to display Requests (such as friend requests).  Again, exactly the same format where a click is required to display the drop down box.

My initial impression of this new layout technology is that it didn’t work.  The notifications don’t seem to be very responsive anymore.  Quite a lot of the time I have to manually check for new notifications and only then do I find out there are some.  The old style of notification, bottom right of the screen, worked much better and was more responsive.  Since drafting this post I have found that, in order to get a true notification (a little red number) you have to hit F5 refresh in the browser as clicking on ‘home’ to refresh the page is simply not enough.  Is that deliberate or an oversight I wonder?

It’s taking me some time to get used to the positioning of the new search bar.  There must be a reason why it’s been put there but I fail to see what.  Once could argue that it’s more inline with where you’d normally expect to find a search bar but, having been used to the Facebook search bar being on the top right, for so long I find it’s merely an annoyance while I get used to it.

Facebooks' updated UI for showing requests.I like the format of the new drop down boxes for Messages, Notifications and Requests but I don’t like the fact I have to click on them – a simple hover would be better and would be far more helpful when learning the new system.

The main feed has now been bordered by two vertical, thin, lines.  This helps improve visibility and concentrates the eye better.

Whereas, before, we had links for the applications on the bottom of our screen, we now have what are called ‘bookmarks’ on the left hand side as a navigation bar.  Apart from a couple of attributes I’ve yet to figure out (such as why do I have ‘1′ next the the groups?) I prefer this format and the corresponding format, when clicking on a link, is also better and kept inline with the new UI.  There is also an “App Directory” link that will take you to a dedicated apps page (although this doesn’t seem to show me my installed apps, just apps to install – something else to hunt around for).

The new UI for Facebook does look different to the old UI and it takes a bit of getting used to but the new features are, mainly, well thought through (as you’d expect from such a large site) although slightly slow.

I was all set to say “I don’t like this new layout” but, in actual fact, when researching it for this post I found that I actually do like it.  It’ll be interesting to see the overall reaction when it’s rolled out further.

Incidentally, I have removed certain information from the screen shots, such as last names and message content, purely for privacy reasons.

The screenshots and testing was performed on Safari for Windows V4.0.4.

How many of you people on Twitter, myself included, have gained a new Twitter follower only to mysteriously lose that follower almost instantly?  I have.  I’ve dug a little further and discovered a new breed of Twitter user (mainly “Social Media Experts” or “Twitter Marketers” as it happens), who obviously don’t really understand the fundamentals of Twitter.

You know this “follow me follow you” (FMFY) type of person.  They are following 26,903 and have 26,849 followers (almost always a deficit of less than a hundred or so).  They’re there, on Twitter, to “Help others achieve perpetual wealth whilst Twitter works itself so you can live your dreams making $4,000 a day”.  Now you know the breed I’m talking about.

So, as far as I can tell, this is how it works…

  • They’ll follow you.
  • They’ll then ‘unfollow’ you within hours or, at most, days if they’ve had no ‘refollow’.

If you then decide to follow them then they normally follow you back.

Now some people might think that’s an efficient way to operate on Twitter.  Now let me tell you why it’s not.

  • Twitter isn’t about numbers.  It’s not about how many people you follow and it’s not about how many people follow you.
  • It’s about creating value in your relationships (most of you reading this, I hope, will already understand this).
  • If someone is playing this FMFY game then they are focussed purely on the numbers and not the value.

These people tend not to get followed back.

0 Facebook… Is it worth it?

Philip Turpin to web — Tags: , ,  

OK, for starters, I just tried to update my status on Facebook voicing my displeasure at how atrocious Facebook has become only to be given the following message:

Facebook status too long message

Here is the original status…

…is disappointed that Facebook is becoming such a challenge to use.

I don’t wish to have to constantly worry about Privacy settings, who sees what, what info is publicly available vs. what isn’t and what is being indexed by BBG (Big Bad Google).

Not only are Facebook insistent with constantly, unnecessarily, updating the UI, they have to mess around with other ’stuff’ that just really doesn’t need it.

With the web having evolved into what it is, things are supposed to be easier, not harder.  Patience and tolerance get considerably shorter and yet FB make it harder?  I wonder how long before FB user numbers start to drop (‘when’ not ‘if’)?

I, for one, have already deactivated one FB account and I’m seriously considering deactivating this account too.  I’m definitely using it less already.

My feeling on this is that it’s going to be easier to break out and use different services for different functions.

  • Status updates?  Twitter / philipturpin.com
  • Photos?  Flickr.
  • Videos?  Youtube / 12 seconds.
  • Content (links, posts etc)?  philipturpin.com

At least I know that anything I post here is publicly viewable, there is no confusion, and I can simply RSS the content into Facebook, thus still maintaining a presence, without being directly involved.

At least this way I’m not reliant on solutions by somebody else – I’m totally in control.

Incidentally, I can be found here:  http://facebook.com/philipturpin ;)

When using Facebook tonight I noticed what appears to be another ‘Facebook Feature’ in the form of anonymous comments.  It appears that certain people, when commenting, have no avatars or names against the comments.  But this only appears to affect the normal Facebook site.  If you browse to http://touch.facebook.com you’ll see that the avatars and names exist next to the comments.

Take the example below, from the full Facebook site, of a Mashable post.  You can see, clearly, the names and avatars are missing.

Facebook full version missing avatars and names from comments.

The example below is from the Facebook ‘touch’ interface (http://touch.facebook.com) for the same Mashable post and you can see the names and avatars of the commenters.

Facebook touch version missing avatars and names from comments.

Although this doesn’t appear to be a security issue it is a little inconvenient.

Switch to our mobile site